…. A qualified lawyer argued that section 7-A of MOFA empties Maharashtra Amending Act 36 of 1986 and by the same amendment Act 4 (1-A… to sell the apartments according to the provisions of the moped). Section 11 provides, among other things, that a project promoter take all necessary steps to complete his title and pass the title on to the company. He has an obligation… The flat racks remain unattended, even after the inclusion of section 7-A in MOFA. This obligation remains, even after the amendment to Section 7, paragraph 1, paragraph ii), of the … 24. The review of Section 4 of the MOFA would show that before accepting a sum of money as a down payment or surety that cannot exceed 20 per cent of the sale price, the developer may enter into a written agreement for the sale with each of these persons who must take or have taken such dwellings, and the agreement is registered in accordance with the registration law. , 1908 (XVI of 1908); and this agreement must be done in the prescribed form. 12. The senator of the Act, which appeared for the proponent of the project, also argues that a review of the evidence indicates that the building at issue is an additional building and not a wing of the building in which the clients of the company`s member housing were located.
There is no challenge, the building violates laws, regulations, etc. and, as such, there is no right of opposition when constructing the additional building. The Qualified Counsel also argues that the 1976 authorization is subject to the provisions of the MOFA under the provisions of the Urban Land Ceiling (short for “ULC”) and is therefore not necessary to verify whether the additional building can be built without the company`s consent. Or not. Current projects involve the inheritance of rights and debts created under the country`s statutes in general and the Indian Contract Act and mofa in particular.